29° and Sunny
Image
Stormwater runoff is a different means of pollution compared to illegal dumping into storm drains, but both can contribute to pollution of the Charles River.
Image by Beyond My Ken, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons.
Editor's note: The below commentator advocates for a proposed regulation at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency which would require certain commercial, industrial, and institutional properties with at least one acre of impervious surface to have Stormwater Pollution Control Plans that comply with a regulated level for phosphorus, which EPA says is "an indicator of parameter for all regulated pollutants." Westwood Minute has attached a copy of EPA's notice below this article.
The following opinion article represents the views and opinions of the author, and not necessarily those of Westwood Minute.
By Emily Norton
Forty years after the cleanup of the Charles River began, we still cannot safely swim in its waters.
The only swimming that takes place in the Charles’ “Lower Basin” – i.e., the area between Watertown and Boston Harbor – is via special permit, and those events are frequently cancelled due to poor water quality.
But now we have an opportunity to change that.
In October 2024, US EPA released a draft permit requiring commercial properties with an acre or more of “impervious surfaces” – surfaces such as pavement and roofs that cannot absorb water – to better control the stormwater pollution coming from their land.
This is a big deal, because stormwater is the main source of pollution degrading water quality in the Charles, as well as in the Mystic and the Neponset Rivers.
When it rains, water passes down roofs and across parking lots, sidewalks and streets, collecting organic material, pathogens and other pollutants in its path. All that untreated water then goes into storm drains and is dumped directly into our rivers. This polluted stormwater runoff fuels toxic algal blooms, feeds invasive plants (which crowd out native species) and degrades habitat, harming the river and making it less safe for recreation.
As climate change brings more intense rainstorms, we are only seeing the volume of polluted water in our rivers increasing. That’s where this new draft permit comes in.
Currently, a disproportionate amount of stormwater pollution comes from land owned by large commercial businesses, industrial sites and universities. EPA’s proposal would require these private property owners to rein in their dirty water runoff, either by reducing the total amount of the impervious surface on their land that the rain passes across, or by implementing different types of eco-friendly infrastructure, such as green roofs, underground holding tanks or vegetated ditches called bioswales. These new requirements have the added benefit of reducing inland flooding, as more green infrastructure and less pavement means stormwater will be stored in tanks or infiltrated into the ground rather than flowing into storm drains.
This will also benefit Westwood taxpayers, as municipalities are required to reduce stormwater pollution within their borders, placing the financial burden entirely on residents. This new permit will force those who are contributing most significantly to the problem to pay their fair share to address it.
These requirements are not yet set in stone, and public support is needed to get them across the finish line. EPA is accepting written comments on this new regulatory approach through March 17. If you care about achieving a swimmable Charles, and a safe healthy environment, your voice matters. Tell the EPA and the incoming administration that we need a clean Charles River now. More information on submitting written comments can be found at crwa.org/advocacy-center.
In the early 20th century, public beaches lined the Charles in Boston and Cambridge. Let’s re-commit to reopening Magazine Beach, Havey Beach, Charlesbank Beach and Gerry’s Landing Beach, so that on a hot summer day we can all cool off with a jump into the refreshing, clean water of the Charles River.
Thanks to Emily Norton, executive director of the Charles River Watershed Association, for contributing this opinion article to Westwood Minute.
Westwood Minute takes no position on the opinion articles that it publishes, but seeks accurate and thoughtful commentary on topics that matter to our community, from a variety of differing viewpoints. Feel free to reply with your reaction below, or submit another perspective to WestwoodInAMinute@gmail.com.
