Westwood Minute is happy to offer a place for community members to contribute to the site. Please register to post or add to the discussion.

Replies

I don't think the town should be paying this.  But even if you thought they should, how could you possibly justify such an amount when the Town itself paid ~$16k in legal bills according to the Select Board?

7
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

The Landtrust complained about how much the Town spent on the legal costs and never brought up the cost of a special Town Meeting and yet they spent $175K on legal fees to fight the Town.  Very disappointing!

7
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive
Westwood Weather: Thursday October 15
High: 62°
Low: 46°
Wind: 11 MPH NNW
Chance of rain: 7%

Sunny, with a high of 62 and low of 46 degrees. Sunny in the morning, overcast in the afternoon and evening, clear overnight.

Replies

I think this is unnecessary when it comes to the Select Board. My kids go to Westwood public schools and will graduate from them. I would probably prefer someone who shared that experience to be on the School Committee but don't see that as a requirement.

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

All residents are paying for the schools and should have an right to serve on the School Committee without having to have children in the Westwood School System; the same as any other board in Town.  

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

I think asking about whether a candidate chose to use the Town’s public school system is a fair question. It’s an issue of transparency.

3
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

Replies

The Westwood Select Board should finish what has been started and let the judge ejudicate the law.  What would be the harm in settleing the disagreement on the rights of the Town?

3
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

1. I suggest you see the actual CR (Sec IV B) rather than referencing someone's opinion. Lynne Viti also spells it out in plain English in a recent post if that would be helpful

1
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Kevin – I appreciate your consideration and reasonable tone. I think that Ms. Sibley’s petition success largely flowed from people that were upset with Select Board’s handling of the FS-1 situation and the perceived lack of transparency. The in-person meetings of the Select Board are a positive result.

4
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

I wholeheartedly agree that our next Select Board member must show respect for all viewpoints and a genuine willingness to work collaboratively to reach the best solutions for our town.

5
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

I agree; compromise is a lost skill of late. Polarized in our opinions about what is correct or righteous, we unwittingly stop hearing (and caring about) the “other”. We become negative versions of ourselves. Angry, pointing blame outward for all the world’s ills.

4
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

There's no need to be dismissive.  Many of us appreciate Andy's thoughtful, informative, and reasoned articles.  He obviously felt the pressure campaign and/or misinformation needed to be addressed.  

4
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

So, what is the purpose of this post?  The Town of Westwood filed court action was to protect the rights of the Town that the Town felt were being violated by the Land Trust.

4
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

Yes, Ms. Viti, you are emphasizing one of Mr. Moore's articulated points. As many may not be aware, often the plaintiff is forced to make the complaint in order to defend their property rights.  A quick search on the nuances of plaintiff vs.

6
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies