Image
Westwood Select Board has adopted a new policy for public comments, establishing expectations for how community members may participate in town meetings. The framework was drafted by Westwood Town Administrator Connor Read, who summarized the policy at the board’s hybrid meeting on Monday, March 9, held both online and in person at Westwood Public Library.
In the board’s past practice, the ability to provide public comment had been at the discretion of the chair. In creating a draft public comment policy, Mr. Read said he worked with Town Counsel Pat Ahearn and he referenced the 2023 decision of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Barron v. Kolenda, which Mr. Read said has altered the landscape of how public boards treat the public comment period. The case has been cited for legal guidance on how municipalities in Massachusetts should handle public comments at town government meetings.
In Barron, the Supreme Judicial Court found unconstitutional a civility code implemented by the Southborough Board of Selectmen, when the board used it to silence a citizen who, during a public comment period, accused board members of violating the state’s Open Meeting Law. The court stated that while civility could be encouraged, the citizen “has the right to accurately complain about violations of law committed by town officials and object to other town actions, including its spending practices, and to express her views vehemently, critically, and personally to the government officials involved.”
Mr. Read summarized key characteristics of his draft public comment policy. Public comments will be heard early in Select Board meetings to allow busy residents to plan to participate and leave for other obligations, if needed. As the meeting proceeds, further public comment may also be allowed. He noted that as a general rule, the Select Board will provide answers to questions raised during public comment. If a question should be answered by another body (such as the Planning Board or Zoning Board of Appeals), the board will make the appropriate referral, he said. If the board does not have an answer ready, it will provide an answer at the beginning of the board’s next meeting. Mr. Read noted that the policy represents a more open process between Select Board and residents.
Select Board Chair Marianne LeBlanc Cummings and Clerk Joe Previtera approved the new policy. Mr. Previtera noted that Mr. Read’s draft captured his concerns “perfectly” and underscored his belief that getting input from the public is of great importance to the board.
Before formally adopting its new public comment policy, and within the same meeting, Westwood Select Board had already begun demonstrating actions in line with the policy. Near the beginning of its March 9 meeting, the board provided answers to outstanding questions that had been raised during its last meeting on February 25 :
In contrast to the board’s recent past practice of leaving residents’ questions unanswered, Select Board during its March 9 meeting promptly responded to the public's questions. A complaint from Lynne Viti about the difficulty of joining Monday night’s meeting, and her suggestion for a more efficient method to allow residents to join, was acknowledged by Ms. Cummings. The Select Board chair noted that the process should be easier than what Ms. Viti experienced that night and said the issue would be looked into. A question from another resident regarding whether meeting participants could be allowed to view a list of online participants was also addressed. Ms. Cummings stated that the board would consider it.
Along with drafting Select Board’s new public comment policy, Mr. Read said he hopes to introduce recurring office hours to meet with the public. Office hours present another opportunity for residents to raise comments with town officials. Mr. Read hosted the first such meeting on Friday morning, March 6, with Ms. Cummings. On Wednesday afternoon, March 18, Mr. Read and Mr. Previtera will hold office hours at Wentworth Hall.
Mr. Read called his meetings with town residents thus far a positive experience. He expressed hopes of creating a culture of welcomeness and communication, which he says will “help me do my job the best I can, to serve this community.”
Select Board’s next meeting is scheduled for Monday, March 23 at 6 p.m., in-person in the Westwood Main Library’s small conference room and online, where residents will have the opportunity to participate under the board's new public comment policy.
Updated 3/11/2026 at 10:08 a.m. A typographcial error of “March 19” for the date of the upcoming office hours with Select Board Clerk Joe Previtera and Town Administrator Connor Read has been corrected to "March 18."
These are great strides in addressing concerns about a lack of openness and two way dialogue raised by Westwood citizens. Thanks to the Select Board and to Mr. Read for listening and acting.
The new liquor regulations, which allow grocery stores to sell it in containers of only one pint and greater, also reflect thoughtful consideration of concerns regarding nip litter that were raised at last year's town meeting.
Thank you Ms. Galkowski for this thoughtful acknowledgement of positive steps being made by our Town government. My generation loves the positive empowerment. Exemplary.
In promulgating the public comment policy, the Select Board has taken a big step towards showing willingness to engage in conversation with Westwood residents about the many important issues at hand—currently, the Fire Station 1 and the budget. Now it’s up to citizens to avail themselves of the new policy when they have questions for their elected officials.
What we continue to wonder about, to ask about, and to be left in the dark about, is the Board’s ongoing refusal to explain why the Town has not withdrawn from the lawsuit against the Land Trust—indeed, why the board has never revealed why the lawsuit against the Trust is “best for the Town.”
The Board’s sole response to the question of why is to state the obvious—something we already knew—that there has been no activity in the case since January 23, when the Town filed a memorandum of law opposing the Land Trust’s Motion To Amendment’s Answer and Counterclaim. Both sides have stipulated that no discovery —request for documents, depositions— will happen until the court rules on cross motions filed in November 2025, for a judgment on the pleadings.
Many citizens ventured out on a very frigid February evening and waited over an hour for the Special Town Meeting on the lawsuit issue, to cast a four-part advisory vote and let the Board know our view that the lawsuit should be withdrawn.
The new public comment policy is salutary—but citizens are still no closer to learning why Town of Westwood v. Westwood Land Trust, Norfolk Superior Court Civil Case No.2582CV00808 is “best for the Town,” or why the Board has not withdrawn from the lawsuit as voters requested.
Have been following the discourse about the Town's lawsuit against the Land Trust and had started to attend Select Board meetings via zoom. I was incredulous when I discovered that the Select Board had implemented a policy in the summer which allowed them not to respond to citizens' questions. I applaud their decision to change that position and appreciate Joe Previtera's comments supporting the rights of the citizens to have their answered. It's good to know that there's a legal precedent supporting this right.
Interesting how the Select Board Chair and/or Town Counsel decided to bury the town's response inside the "Chair's Update" on its agenda, despite the resident asking for an open public discussion under its own topic on a future SB agenda. Adding insult to injury, neither of the referenced public meetings of the Personnel Board (in 2022 and in 2024) were video-recorded leaving absolute trust in that the minutes of those meetings are accurate...how convenient?