Westwood Minute is happy to offer a place for community members to contribute to the site. Please register to post or add to the discussion.

Replies

For many years I worked for the U.S. Coast Guard.  A core value there, as well as at many other U.S. military branches, was respect.  I think respect is missing here.

The McFarlands have donated large parcels of land to Westwood to maintain open space.  This was their intent with the land in question.

6
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Spot on Mr. Murray.  To say the least.  By persuing the law suit the Select Board has opened Pandora's box when it comes to overriding the wishes and the intent, of  donations  made to the town.   Not to mention the resignation a respected Board member and the division it has created in the town.  

1
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

Replies

Replies

Replies

Replies

Replies

Correction: The Westwood Select Board members in 2000, when the Town formally accepted and acknowledged the Conservation Restriction on 665 Clapboardtree Street including the meadow, were Anthony Antonellis, Michael Walsh and Patrick Ahearn.

3
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

Thank you for this very helpful explanation. I think it’s also important to keep in mind that the Bean Farm has stated that their intention would be to use the land “for generations”, so they have no actual intention of returning the land to a meadow state.

6
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Thank you for this explanation. It is very surprising and disappointing that the Select Board did not do their own due diligence into the ecological consequences of farming as they were contemplating this lawsuit and asserting that it is in the "public interest"! 

5
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

Thank you, Mr. Christensen, for your helpful response to Ms. Galkowski. For additional clarity, we felt uncomfortable putting our full names after witnessing some baseless, negative accusations and remarks made from the WLT supporters toward the Bean Farm supporters.

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

I am curious about a few claims that you state here. Does denying the use of this particular land by the Bean Farm necessarily mean that the farm will cease to exist? If the farm closes or moves, does that necessarily mean that the Beans’ land will be fully developed?

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Mr. Moore, I think it’s very inappropriate that you are projecting “criticism” and me being “upset” onto my comment, as someone who has felt more than welcome to voice your own opinions on this and other posts.

1
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

I am not surprised at the speculations on cronyism and quid pro quo. The lack of transparency on an issue centered on one business + the fact that the Bean family are the largest donors to the Chair's campaign is enough to raise this question! Campaign finance records can be found here: 

3
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

I am not surprised at the speculations on cronyism and quid pro quo. The lack of transparency on an issue centered on one business + the fact that the Bean family are the largest donors to the Chair's campaign is enough to raise this question!

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Mr. Moore, please, could you  be more specific about your assertion here, so  those  readers following this exchange of positions can understand what you are referring to in your brief post?

I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

Mr. Christensen, with respect to your comments on the cost of the town meeting. Many residents did reach out to the select board, by email and public comment at select board meetings. You can review the videos of those meetings.

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive