Image
As of Sunday evening, January 11, 2026, 568 people had signed onto Westwood resident Andy Moore’s Change.org petition, “Save Farming in Westwood, MA” - a petition that Mr. Moore told Westwood Minute that he started to “gauge and document” support among Westwood residents for Westwood Select Board’s lawsuit against Westwood Land Trust that seeks to compel the nonprofit to allow the town to put eight of 28 acres of town-owned conservation land to agricultural use, under a conservation restriction (CR) that is enforced by the land trust.
Mr. Moore thought it was a good idea to start the Change.org petition based on the response he received to a previous Change.org petition that he undertook in 2024 to protest the prohibition against off-leash dog walking in Westwood’s Lowell Woods.
Mr. Moore described the experience of watching the signatures accumulate. “Initially, it wasn’t that fast, but then the signatures started coming in quickly,” he said. By January 7th, about one week after he started the petition, his petition had collected over 500 signatures. Mr. Moore recognizes that not all signatures are from Westwood residents. Under Change.org rules, a petition cannot be limited to Westwood residents or registered voters, he explained.
According to a graphic on Mr. Moore’s Change.org petition, as of January 11th, 63 percent of the 568 signatories are from zip codes 02090, 02062, and 02081 (respectively, Westwood, Norwood, and Walpole). The graphic appears to show that signatories are drawn from a general area that is pictured as far north as Waltham /Medford, west to Ashland/ Milford, south to North Attleboro/Brockton, and east to Weymouth/Rockland.

This OpenMapTiles map image capture (1/11/2026) from Change.org shows the approximate area where signatories to Mr. Moore's petition are from. It is made available under the Open Database License: http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/. Any rights in individual contents of the database are licensed under the Database Contents License: http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/
Mr. Moore’s Change.org petition, created on December 30th, supports Select Board and The Bean Family Farm – the potential farmer of the conservation land – and is positioned on the opposite side of the fence to a December petition sponsored by fellow Westwood resident Erin Sibley. Ms. Sibley’s petition questions Select Board’s decision to enter litigation against Westwood Land Trust. It also calls for greater transparency by town officials. Ms. Sibley's petition ultimately was successful in gathering about one and a half times the number of signatures needed to meet the goal of calling a Special Town Meeting to force a townwide discussion on the Select Board’s decision to litigate. At the Special Town Meeting on February 2nd, residents on both sides of the issue will have a chance to discuss and vote on what they view to be the path they think Select Board should take.
Representatives of both sides of the arguments have been vocal in media and in public comments. They have taken advantage of the short time reserved for public comment during the start of recent Select Board meetings to air their opinions and grievances. However, under a recently implemented policy announced by Chair Robert Gotti at the board’s meetings of June 9, 2025 and June 23rd, 2025, and first fully implemented at the board’s meeting on July 9, 2025, the public may comment, but should not expect reply from Select Board during that window of time.
At Select Board’s remotely held meeting via Zoom of January 5th, Select Board Chair Robert Gotti noted a “long list of people” in attendance, as he called on residents to speak during the designated 15 minute public comment period.
Lynne Viti, inaugural Poet Laureate of Westwood, began the comments by questioning why Select Board has continued remote public meetings when social distancing from the covid pandemic is no longer needed. She expressed frustration that the meeting format used by the board provides no chat function for residents to communicate, no indication to public attendees of the number or identity of who is the public is attending. She suggested that the board adopt an in-person or hybrid format.
Several residents commented in support of Select Board and The Bean Family Farm:
Residents also articulated their views in support of Westwood Land Trust:
As demonstrated by the comments both vocalized at this and earlier Select Board meetings, and written comments on platforms like Westwood Minute, the litigation between Select Board and WLT has fueled passions on both sides. It has also spurred thoughtful argument.
“I hope they come to a reasonable settlement,” said Mr. Moore. “I hope the Beans are allowed to farm. If they are not, they’re going to close and it’s a shame. I think it will reflect poorly on the town of Westwood if the Bean Farm closes because we want to maintain a meadow.”
I don't think it is fair to compare the two actions as "dualing" petitions. The change.org petition is an internet survey that collects some evidence of public support for the select board's course of action. The petition by residents to call a special town meeting is an official and extraordinary process which has sucessfully initiated a town meeting to discuss the issue and vote, as the legislative body of the town, on the specific articles proposed, all of which focus more on the actions of the select board than on any issue of whether or not supporting one resident's desire to expand their farm onto town owned conservation land is a good idea or not.
I agree. You can't compare these petitions at all. 100% of the signatures were from Westwood residents requesting a special town meeting due to the lack of transparency around this lawsuit while only "63 percent of the 568 signatories are from zip codes 02090, 02062, and 02081 (respectively, Westwood, Norwood, and Walpole)." Residents of Norwood and Walpole don't have to pay the taxes funding this lawsuit so, while I appreciate our neighboring towns, I'm not sure why their signatures hold weight.
Nonresidents of Westwood and those who do not vote in Westwood are not really relevant to the issues at hand in this matter. As he readily admits, Mr. Moore’s Change.org online unvetted petition includes signers from many other towns who are obviously not the Westwood Select Board’s constituency .The numbers of signers Mr. Moore boasts of are unreliable. His petition’s questionable results misrepresent the views of many Westwood voters, who are deeply concerned about how our Town officials spend our taxes. Many citizens of Westwood believe in good faith that their elected leaders have, with little to no public discussion of the matter, unwisely involved the Town in a lawsuit, Town of Westwood, by and through its Select Board. v. Westwood Land Trust, Norfolk Superior Court, No. 82CV00808, that may be both protracted and expensive, at a time when we are all focused on husbanding our financial resources, on the personal and civic levels alike.
And online petition signers from Walpole, Ashland, Brockton, Milford, North Attleboro, Weymouth and Medford are not going to be on the hook for legal fees for the Town of Westwood to sue an all-volunteer, not-for-profit Land Trust, whose sole reason for existing is to steward what little open land we have in Westwood.
We have a middle school with pressing physical plant problems and classrooms that need immediate attention. More tax dollars to be spent. We need to address our immediate need for better quarters for our firefighters and other first responders. More tax dollars to be spent. For sure, Mr. Moore’s petition signers are nowhere near as worried about these pressing matters as are Westwood voters who are asking, pleading, begging the Select Board to drop this lawsuit now.
Mrs Viti,
The overwhelming majority of yard signs around Westwood that I see, including the one on my front yard and the ones across the street at my neighbors, are in favor of the Town’s lawsuit against the WLT. I would guess approximately 9 to 1 in favor. Is that similar to what you see?
Hi Mr. Christiansen,
Of course I see signs that save "save" the Bean Farm! Who doesn't like the farm! The farm is nice. It's hard to not like the farm. But conservation restrictions, legal documents recorded and meant to preserve what little open space that remains, for generations to come, are also nice--they are for the public good. Open vistas and fields and untouched woods and cross -country ski trails and hiking trails fand Lowell Woods for hikers and dogwalkers alike--in our densely developed town are good--are better than good. Lowell Woods and Sen-Ki--all good.
The issue here is much more complicated than those yard signs suggest. There has been a lack of clear communication between our elected officials and voters about this legal challenge to the conservation restriction on 665 Clapboardtree.That's why the 300+ Westwood registered voters (obtained in one short week jsus before christmas) signed the petition asking for a Special Town Meeting, to learn what we should have been informed about over two years ago.
Hopefully there will be some civil discussion among voters and with our elected officials on February 2 as to why our Town is suing our Land Trust, and why the lawsuit is good for the Town at all.
I hope to see you there!
Mrs Viti,
Thank you for your prompt response. I'll gently point out that you misspelled my name and did not answer my question. Allow me to rephrase. Presumably, we do not live in the same part of Westwood nor do we frequent the same parts regularly. Therefore, our answer to the question might be different.
What percentage of signs do you see that say "Save the Bean Family Farm" versus those that say "Conservation Not Litigation"?
Thanks, Westwood Minute community, for the thoughtful discussion on this topic. As the conversation continues, just a reminder of our guidelines for participating on this platform (also viewable here: https://westwoodminute.town.news/g/westwood-ma/n/214850/westwood-minute…)
1. State your opinion/reply/comment respectfully.
2. Give other community members the benefit of a doubt. You deserve the same.
3. Keep comments constructive and argue the issue, rather than attack the person. Arguing against a person's position is fine, but please avoid name calling.
4. Disagreeing, taking an unpopular position, or arguing a point are NOT reasons for removal. Westwood Minute is very reluctant to remove any comments and posts -- free speech and open debate is important, along with the practice of engaging in constructive disagreements. However, personal attacks, profanity, self-serving promotions, and discriminatory or inflammatory remarks are subject to removal.
5. Confusing posts may be removed to keep postings relevant and useful to readers, but again, the goal is to avoid removing any postings whenever possible.
Thanks for your participation in this community conversation.