Opinion

Prepared, Professional, and Public-Minded: Elect JoAnna French and Amanda Phillips to School Committee

This post expresses the views and opinions of the author(s) and not necessarily that of Westwood Minute management or staff.

Serving on School Committee requires a deep sense of responsibility, hard work, and respect for all members of our community. Joanna French and Amanda Phillips’s preparation, experience, and engagement in schools make them the best fit for this job.

  • Preparation: The difference in preparation between the candidates was very clear at the League of Women Voters’ candidate forum. Incumbent Amanda Phillips was well-versed in every aspect of the school’s operations, budget, and processes. JoAnna French answered every question posed with outstanding depth, knowledge, and clarity. Her preparation reflects a willingness to do the hard work – the legwork – of getting to know teachers, administrators, and families. A particularly striking example was the question on the school budget. Both French and Philips understood a municipal budget and articulated where the gaps in the budget were, and what was actually actionable given the structure of the budget. This knowledge is clearly a product of Phillips’s service on the committee and French’s regular attendance at school committee meetings including her advocacy for Chapter 70 funding (which predates this election). On the other hand, Themistocle’s answers about “running profit and loss,” creating a “plan” and using “resources wisely”, sounded very vague and non-specific.
  • Public Engagement and Experience: Local voting records and school committee minutes only reinforce that French and Phillips have been more engaged in civic life, even before running for this position. Since 2018, JoAnna French has voted six times, Amanda Phillips has voted nine times and Tom Themistocles has voted two times in local elections. A quick glance at Phillips’s and French’s resume and track records confirm that their contributions to the town are extensive and wide-ranging. Phillips has many impressive accomplishments on the school committee during an incredibly challenging time. French’s leadership at the middle school has been pivotal in a return to social events and normalcy for our middle schoolers. Themistocle’s has been active in town sports including being on the Board of the Westwood Boosters. Recently, it came to light that the Westwood Boosters Twitter feed is highly politicized including anti-vax and demeaning, transphobic content. This issue is sure to gain more attention in the coming days and it begs the question of what kind of Board oversight allowed unchecked and disrespectful social media content.
  • Professionalism: Westwood has a highly effective and well-functioning school committee. Phillips is part of this cohesive team, and French’s knowledge, ideas, and professionalism would be a natural addition. As a testament to this, only these two candidates have been endorsed by different members of the current school committee and the Select Board. A particularly worrisome aspect of Tom Themistocles’ candidacy is the financial support he has received from members of One Westwood– the group whose extreme views have been outright rejected by our school administration and the WHS student community. This raises the serious question of whether such a candidate can work with our School leadership in a productive manner.

There is no doubt in my mind that all three candidates care about Westwood schools and students. But the job needs more than that: preparation, commitment to inclusion and respect, data focus, knowledge, and attention to detail. Even more so when a new Superintendent will be on-boarded. School Committee members must be ready for the job on Day One. All the information above plus my instincts as a parent, manager, and citizen tell me JoAnna French and Amanda Philips are who we should vote for– and hire.

Respectfully submitted,

Ishani Tewari,  45 Far Reach Rd

9 15
I'm interested (3)
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

"respect for all members of our community" - please practice what you preach.  Last time I checked Tom is a valued member of our community.  Too bad those candidates and their supporters couldn't run positive campaigns on all that they are trying to accomplish.  Unfortunately they did not, every chance they had they tried to take digs and negative campaign smears at Tom just because of a difference of opinion, which should be treated with respect.  Instead they chose hate, not very inclusive or respectful.  Talking with the elder community members that are involved in our town election they cannot believe what has transpired these last two elections, so negative so hateful...

This all being said, I have not heard one mention of the high school, deemed so great.  Well the covid rent is coming due, mcas scores are down, teacher attendance is abysmal, there are no substitute teachers, and students come and go as they please.  The Friday before February vacation 17 teachers called in sick.  I believe inclusion is important but we cannot allocate 100% of our resources to it .  We do need to keep the teachers in the school and educating our children, if we do not, those mcas scores will not correlate with the increase in taxes we have seen over the years.

4
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Positive campaign? Tom used an entire mailing to inexplicably attack a candidate from last year, and mocked a current candidate in a post on his campaign Facebook page. I have not seen either of the other candidates comment publicly on Tom. Other members of the community have expressed opinions that are relevant to making decisions about which candidate to vote for.

As for the high school, have you asked the question of either of the other two candidates? Teacher staffing is low everywhere right now, that is not unique to Westwood. I have not heard Tom present a solid plan to deal with those issues, does he have one? Also, it’s MCAS not mcast for heavens sake.

Finally, Tom may be a valued member to some people in the community, but the anti-trans posts on his Twitter feed (which was public for the first several weeks of his campaign until he realized he should hide that) are offensive and alienating to many members of the community. Tom alone is accountable for that hateful content, and it is surely not representing respect or inclusiveness.

6
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Oof Westwood Parent II, not cool, in poor taste. I'm sure you don't mean to make light of Anxiety--a very real, very serious disorder that affects and hurts nearly 20% of Americans--nearly 10% of them children? Anxiety causes real suffering--nothing to make light of. If you are truly struggling, please reach out in earnest. If your intention is merely to attack someone in a public forum, because you don't agree with or don't like my post, please refer back to Marc's original post about being respectful. Either way, please have respect for the very real issue that is mental health for many in our society. Take care and be well! 

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Hi there, Marc--thanks for chiming in! First off, I'm so confused: what exactly is an "mcast", and how is it being maligned or neglected? Additionally, these "digs and negative campaign smears" of which you speak, are in fact merely references to factual information related to this candidate. He has posted highly offensive and transphobic tweets...fact. He is supported (check out the yard signs) and funded (check out the financial paperwork) by the highly radically offensive organization One Westwood...fact. His responses in the LWV forum lacked important details, in contrast to the other two candidates...fact. I have no doubt that Tom is "valued" by members of this community...but I am skeptical that those members share the values publicly supported and committed to by district and community leadership. But please, convince me otherwise. I'm here to listen. In the meantime, I greatly appreciate this article--thank you to the brilliant author! It is fair, rational, and more objective than subjective. 

3
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

watch out neighbor they are smarter than you, and will make fun of you too... not bullies, just super bright people who are more advanced than everyone, so it's totally okay or is it ok? I'm too simple to know

1
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Hi Neighbor! First of all, thank you for calling some of us "bright". What a nice descriptor. Also, please don't call yourself "simple". I'm positive you're anything but. You figured out how to post anonymously on this platform--that counts for something. Secondly, you care enough to voice your opinion--that makes you aware, involved, and invested. Fabulous. Second--you're totally right. I apologize for lightly ribbing Marc for not knowing that MCAS are MCAS and not mcast. But in all fairness, that's kind of an important detail for someone voicing some strong opinions about testing and scores and teacher attendance and whatnot. But I certainly could have been more diplomatic. Thank you for keeping us on track! In the meantime, I stand by my other statements about the factual data related to this race and the transphobic social media posts by the candidate TomT, and the not quite above board use of a district social media platform... So concerning. What are your thoughts? I'm here to listen, thanks!

3
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

MCAS scores actually look pretty good.  I know the district is always striving to improve but I don't see anything that indicates that we are not on the right path.  Our scores are in the top 10 in the state in a number of categories and we saw improvements in scores in some categories.  Here is the link to a presentation from a school committee meeting in November 2022 summarizing scores:  https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1VmvYeMKSQ2o37ueSuy6sTytn7gPZTJO…  and here is a link to the raw MCAS scores from the Department of Education:  https://profiles.doe.mass.edu/mcas/mcascharts2.aspx?linkid=33&orgcode=0…;  I encourage readers to take a look at the data for themselves. 

6
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Those of us following the budget process and contract negotiations this winter learned (some may have already been aware) that salaries account for 85% of the district's budget.  The commenter's indication that the district spends 100% of its budget on inclusion was probably intended as hyperbole, but I think it's important to clarify.  Not only that, but Inclusion is not part of a single line item of the budget as far as I can tell.  You can check for yourself by reviewing this  http://www.westwood.k12.ma.us/userfiles/files/Exhibits%20and%20Sheets(1… or some of the other detailed budget documents for the district.  All publicly available here:  http://www.westwood.k12.ma.us/district/school-committee/budget.cfm  So spending energy to be a more inclusive community is in no way to the financial detriment of other important initiatives in the district.

5
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Westwood Minute Community Conduct Guidelines (click heading for more)

Great to see that folks are feeling free to comment on this platform! Yesterday, I just composed some guidelines for community postings, and with any new conversation that pops up, I'll be posting them so we're all on the same page as to what to expect when sharing on Westwood Minute. Feel free to click on the heading above for the complete posting, and a shorter summary is copied here:

Westwood Minute Community Conduct Guidelines:

1. State your opinion/reply/comment respectfully.

2. Give other community members the benefit of a doubt. You deserve the same.

3. Keep comments constructive and argue the issue, rather than attack the person.

4. Disagreeing, taking an unpopular position, or arguing a point are NOT reasons for removal. However, personal attacks, profanity, self-serving promotions, and discriminatory or inflammatory remarks are subject to removal.

5. Confusing posts may be removed to keep postings relevant and useful to readers.

6. If you have any questions or concerns, reach out and email WestwoodInAMinute@gmail.com.

Thanks, neighbors, for taking the time to share your thoughts.

I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive