Opinion

In Response to One Westwood, Westwood Students Speak Out in Favor of DEI in Our Schools

This post expresses the views and opinions of the author(s) and not necessarily that of Westwood Minute management or staff.

We asked some current and former Westwood Students what they think about One Westwood's recently published article, which is linked here. One Westwood is a group in our town, looking to suppress diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in our school system as they are currently being implemented. While this is one view point, endorsed by One Westwood and article contributors -- Ken Mackin, Nicole Moses, Jacquie Garcia, Adrian Webb-Johnson, Chris Hancock and Carl D'Angio -- it is evident that Westwood students are not all in agreement and have a lot to say about the injustice, cruelty, and blatant racism and transphobia embedded within their beliefs. We will not stand by and let ideas like this lead to negative change in our community. We will not be silenced, and we will keep fighting. We implore Westwood residents to vote in the town election on April 26th after having done research on the candidates. 

We asked students to describe their reaction to the article in three words. Located at the end of this article is  a visual representation of the words that Westwood students use to describe their reaction to the article. The larger words are words that have been repeated multiple times.

Below, we have also included quotations from students, not only those who disagree but also some that agree. We believe it is important to represent everyone who wants to have their voice be heard, so that is why we have included every submission we have received (unless it did not follow the guidelines given in the survey). 

EDIT: We do not speak for the entirety of the Westwood student and graduate population.

"I think it’s an embarrassment to Westwood as a whole and paints the town as a place where hatred and bigotry are allowed to flourish. Not only that, but the gross misunderstanding of concepts such as equity. racism, and 'sexual preference' emphasize exactly why we need these concepts taught in schools." - Devin Bellevue

"For years I didn’t have the words to explain who I was. I was mocked, teased and bullied and when I did find the words on my own I was terrified. Erasing us from education won't erase us, but it will hurt us. I am insanely worried" - anonymous

"I feel that the underlying nature of this article is communicating that there is something inherently wrong about topics such as gender dysphoria and non-heterosexuality. Suggesting that these topics should be avoided until the child is 'of a more appropriate age' inherently suggests that this topic is inappropriate. In order to foster a culture of understanding, empathy, and compassion, we must give children the opportunity to understand these topics from a young age." - Maddie Rothstein

"How do you hear the term 'anti-racist' and see something wrong with that? Who are you to govern your children’s identities and exploration of that in a safe space? This article is violent and dangerous and shows how your political views interrupt your care for your children and the community’s well being." - Madi Brady

"This is a disgrace to the school system. The examples the article gave that they deem inappropriate (elementary school student having a conversation about gay pride, etc) are so out of touch with the modern political and social climate. Of course children need to learn about these important issues that permeate modern society. Advocating for a curriculum that doesn’t address racism, sexism, homophobia, and overall bigotry is an attack on students of color, women, and students who identify as lgbtq+. Times are changing and these unfortunate parents are stuck in the 1950s. This was extremely disheartening to learn about, and I hope the Westwood school system completely disregards 'OneWestwood’s' requests. Teach Westwood kids about race, gender, sexuality, etc, and maybe they will be better than the generation before them. A non-racist Westwood has no place for this hateful, bigoted, and pathetic group." - anonymous

"It does seem weird that the article has to clarify that the intent is not for a return to a 1950s characterization of race. If the author's of this article want the kids in the community to learn about the history of any subject then they should be fine with them learning about all of the historical context. I don't really understand the issue of learning about the historical biases of a certain industry towards a certain group. The Harlem Renaissance was a response to segregation in the arts, including the music industry, that was itself a product of general discrimination in the Jim Crow era. This history is important, because regardless of the important milestones in Civil Rights achieved during the 20th century, the biases still remain because the position that someone's grandma was in the 20s does have an effect on where their grandchild is today, that's just how time works, one thing leads to another. I wonder if the authors of this article had parents or grandparents that were vets from WWII or Vietnam and I would ask them if they think that affected how their life turned out, I know that my grandfather's time in the WWII changed the course of my family history dramatically and the same goes for everyone who experiences a world altering event. As for the concerns about using preferred pronouns I'm curious, why should you care that someone wants to be called something different to what they were assigned at birth, especially when it is an extensive, but scientifically sound and ethical process to transition both socially and/or medically? That's their prerogative and a polite society would make that individual welcome in their community. It seems inconsistent to simultaneously want the schools to not support American ideals of individual freedom, and also want to force kids that may or may not be your own into the closet. I appreciate the time anyone takes to read these words and I do not intend offense to any of the authors of the article, however misguided and projected I believe their sentiments to be. I have my own list of criticisms of the school system, same as anyone else, but the concept of teaching all sides of history and a modicum of respect are not on that list." - Tiernan Goss

"I think these Parents and Grandparents have a right to be concerned. The fact that it took remote learning for parents to figure out that they were not impressed with what their students are being taught says a lot about the public school system. If parents, grandparents, families, etc spend a fortune of their tax dollars to fund the public school system, they should be aware or have a say of what their children should learn. They also make a good point about age restrictions. They are not necessarily against their students learning about racism, transgenderism, equity, etc. but they are against it being taught when their students are not mature enough to understand it. The reason for this is the same reason why we don’t tell children at 5 years old how they were born. I think parents have a right to be disappointed and it’s long overdue for them to share their concerns whether we, young adults/children like it or not. We are not parents." - anonymous

"I am actually in disbelief that this article exists. I’m sorry if that’s rude, but I will not be respectful to people that have such blatantly disgusting values. These parents are literally complaining about their kids being exposed to books about trans kids, respecting pronouns, education around equity (i know i know…but what about the gulags) and anti-racism, etc. It’s hateful white supremacy and heteronormativity disguised as a concern for education. They’re trying to “trojan horse” hatred into the classroom. As if that’s not bad enough, they have the audacity to claim they mean no disrespect to the school teachers and administrators, which is a slap in the face. They’re complaining about “politicizing education,” but being LGBTQ or experiencing discrimination as a racial minority isn’t politics—it’s part of your identity. In fact, it’s these unicellular bozos that are making it political. They act as though our kids will be better off without the knowledge, as if the issues will disappear if we don’t acknowledge them. LGBT kids will still experience internal struggle with their sexuality and gender—that’s not going away because it’s no longer discussed in school. Non-white people will still encounter racial bias and discrimination—our (let’s face it…90% white) kids will just be clueless and ignorant on how to be actively anti-racist. Even with the DEI education, kids in my grade still took and posted pictures with a racist lawn jockey from the Underground Railroad. They had no idea what it even was. Imagine how ignorant the kids will be if education is stopped all together. What message does that send to our students of color about how we value them? The cherry on top of it all is that the One Westwood parents somehow feel 'discluded.' The white, cis, heterosexual parents feel they’re suffering for being in the majority. Get a CT scan and delete Facebook, for the love of God. I have two sisters still in the schools and will fight tooth and nail to make sure they are exposed to the DEI education that they deserve and they need as kids." - Joseph Aeschliman

"So sad that people still are capable of thinking like this. I would hope we want to progress rather than regress, especially when I can list various issues with the curriculum and staff." - anonymous

"Move if you're not happy." - anonymous

"To be brief, I feel like this town specifically, with a majority white population, has many issues with diversity and equity, that I myself have witnessed and experienced. The fact that there are people, adults in my town, working against change, and for hate, is so disheartening and disappointing." - anonymous

"The parents who brought forth these concerns are completely correct. There is absolutely nothing wrong with not wanting your kids to be indoctrinated into hating their own race and having mental illness (transgenderism) thrust upon them." - anonymous

"School teaches values as well as facts, and it's important that the school produces good people, not just smart people. I don't want these people to have any say in what goes on at my school." - anonymous

"Instead of Westwood being progressive and accepting of the LGBT+ and POC community, this is a regression in our town's values and is totally unacceptable. It is important for younger students/any student to be aware and be properly educated about these topics. This shouldn't be a "political" thing. I'm disgusted that we have gotten to this point." - Chloe Goodman

"I hate it and that it involved my hometown. It needs to be stopped. Westwood schools is doing good work and I refuse to be a part of a community that is racist, homophobic, and supports ‘all lives matter’ movements. I am disgusted that members of my home town feel this way. They should be ashamed of themselves for trying to force people to be racist and homophobic just like them." - anonymous

"Westwood is a town the not only upholds white supremacy, but benefits from it directly. People like officer Webb-Johnson support an ideal of pseudo perfection that can only be obtained through hatred and misinformation. Westwood is tired of racist police, classist communities, and old money who want to continue these antiquated and draconian belief systems." - anonymous

"The language used in the article is very misinformed and misleading. It also feels like they are unopen to criticism even though it’s a public opinion. Many of the things that were said in the piece were completely false and the authors of the author made multiple wrong accusations like comparing equity to the gulags and saying anti racism is the same as racism. I feel it’s a little scary to know that there are parents in Westwood that are not allowing their children to learn about the world; they claim that this education will harm them in the future, but I think they would be more harmed if they stay uneducated on things that could affect them and their peers." - anonymous

"I think this article has no faith in our children. The world is progressing into a more open place where everyone should feel comfortable with their own bodies from a young age. By talking about diversity and gender in our young classes children can learn to make those decisions on their own without the help of adults who have their own preferences. Also, as high schoolers who are soon to be in college, there is nothing wrong with learning and talking about race when you sign up for a music class because that is what is going on in the real world. Anyone who wants to hide and pretend these problems don’t exist in the real world are ignorant. Finally, I think if you really want to talk about highlighting everyone as an individual you would let them learn about the differences we all have as people rather than trying to make everyone the same. Being different is what makes us unique and what makes us, us." - anonymous

"I have way too many things to say about this article." - Christina Yebba

"This is honestly one of the most embarrassing things to ever happen to our town. These parents claim that new initiatives are hindering learning and academics in the classroom but they are so hyper focused on their own white, straight students that they do not realize that so many other students need these new initiatives to feel safe, included and be successful in their own school. I promise that your student will still be able to learn Spanish conjugations and ready The Call of The Wild while still using preferred pronouns. I promise your student can still attend PE class or learn the quadratic formula on Indigenous peoples day instead of Columbus Day. This OneWestwood letter is so tone-deaf and belittles so many issues that NEED to be talked about in young people's lives." - Ashley Fafara

"I am ashamed to have grown up and go to public school in a town where the parents do not allow for everyone to be recognized in the curriculum. Imagine you were the kindergartner and believe that you were born in the wrong body along with having your parents say it’s wrong. Do the parents understand how traumatizing they are being?! Even if that child doesn’t identify as trans, they now have this negative connotation associated with their parents that they can’t tell them anything they need to without the parents sharing their opinion as law. The reason racism is talked about in piano lab is because the teacher wants everyone to truly know about the music industry and the systemic racism embedded into it. The fact that parents are offended by this, goes to show how behind their thinking is. I graduated in 2021 and let me tell you, I have learned so much from the few teachers that are trying to talk about race and lgbtq+ and it has helped me more than the quadratic formula. So please let your children experiment and allow them to be their own self. As a parent you are there to help them along their journey, not suppress them into beliefs that you feel are right. Because, in the end, your decisions affect your child the most. This is their life. Let them be who they want. Lastly, let them live how they want." - Tania Martin

"The way this article was written is so disgusting. To think that parents, and students have these opinions is so disappointing but I can’t say I'm surprised. I don’t think these parents should subject the entirety of Westwood public schools to their own absurd beliefs when the point of having these important discussions in the classroom is purely for education." - anonymous

"I feel as though this article is motivated by the creators' biases." - anonymous

"HOPE NONE OF YALL HAVE GAY KIDS…. 😳" - anonymous

"Westwood lacks diversity as a whole. That’s already an issue within itself. Deciding to take steps back into the past and make a conscious choice to stop educating students on diversity, equality, and inclusion is hurting EVERYONE involved. This attempt will not stop awareness of the rights of the lgbtq+ community and basic human rights. I am extremely upset for those who are apart of a minority group and have to attend Westwood Public Schools knowing people think they don’t deserve representation like everyone else. Ashamed to be from this town right now." - Ashlyn Warren

"It was scary to me to think people felt this way in Westwood. It felt so out of touch with reality to me. Have any of these people ever sat in a class at Westwood High School, Elementary School, or Middle School? The teachers work so hard to present unbiased opinions. To think that teaching the real history of things, is promoting some kind of agenda is absurd and exposing children to new concepts of gender will be normalized. This article sounds like people are afraid of the future but the future will come and inclusion will persist. A horrible representation of our community." - anonymous

"The One Westwood article seems to completely miss the point of anti-racism (which is quite literally to just not be racist) and the point of learning about gender expression and identity, which has absolutely nothing to do with sexuality and only has to do with how people wish to express themselves as people. Pronouns are something that everyone learns and has learned since the English language has been taught (it’s just how we refer to people or things) and to actively be against someone’s preferred pronouns is horrendously transphobic and just plain rude. Why do other people’s pronouns upset You so much? Furthermore, to take this education away from children is to harm children who may be confused about their gender as it will isolate them and make them feel alone/weird/different. Lastly, the comment that One Westwood would like to “return to the 2010s” is concerning in that it implies that they support the common language of the earlier part of the decade (which includes homophobia, transphobia, ableist slurs, etc), but also implies that they think LGBTQ+ and racism issues were just… nonexistent or less talked about, which is not true. Overall, this article showcases the hateful attitude and opinions of One Westwood, which worries me as a resident and someone who cares about the education, mental health, and safety of children in the Westwood school system." - anonymous

"As someone who grew up in Westwood schools, the thought of moving backwards is incredibly disturbing considering the district is barely progressive enough as is. I love Westwood and believe in its improvement, and I take comfort in knowing that there are great teachers, students, and parents who will not succumb to the logic of an article like this. My heart goes out to kids in Westwood who will wait until graduating to be themselves because of people like those who supported this article." - anonymous

https://westwoodminute.town.news/g/westwood-ma/post/73248/response-one-westwood-westwood-students-speak-out-favor-dei-our-schools
15 31
I'm interested
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Replies

I am SO inspired by the majority of these responses!!!!!  The kids are going to be ok!!!!!!!!  I have been so disheartened by the One Westwood media blitz, distressed and outraged that our town has fostered such hate, such small mindedness, such boldy racist, homophobic and anti progress.   These responses have soothed my soul!! These kids are the future, and the fact that they are outraged, distressed, and frankly disgusted by the words of One Westwood that are anti progress, uninformed, limited in scope, cruel, and hopeless outdated is giving me so much hope!  Thank you to the writers of this response, the kids who responded, and the teachers and families who have shaped these kids into caring, humane, and open minded future leaders.

12
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

To borrow words from the late Jahaira DeAlto: 

“We are on the threshold of another Renaissance, another great time of progress, and these young people are standing on the front lines of it and will be the ones to get us over that ridge. I continue to be floored by their tenacity, I continue to be fueled by their tenacity, I continue to be fueled by their drive. “

Thank you, to all the young people who speak out against hate and ignorance, I will continue to be fueled by you all.

Ellen Rollings, WHS ‘90 and current WPS parent

11
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

C'mon, you all know better than this. It is not racist, homophobic, small-minded, etc. to disagree with Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) being taught in classrooms. Parents simply want to be the ones to teach their children about these sensitive topics. It is shameful to bring in children to this debate and to get them involved in a discussion where they don't know all of the facts. Have you looked at the math grade-level proficiency scores this past year in Westwood Public Schools?- well, they're pathetic. One Westwood's message is very reasonable: let the parents teach about controversial topics and let the schools teach reading, writing, history, math, etc. (the important topics).

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Hi “John Doe”
 I think you’re missing the point- education is so much more than math, science, etc. There is a reason it has become part of the curriculum- children are suffering! Studies show better outcomes with teaching this- and it isn’t all kids learn, it is just incorporated.  And how is being mad about changing  “Columbus Day” to “Indigenous Peoples Day” anything but bigoted? What has been done in the past has not worked so why would we continue it that way? I think most of these children sound more informed and educated than you and all of the authors of the One Westwood article. And I would venture to guess that if it wasn’t taught in schools, those families wouldn’t be teaching it at all in the home either.

9
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Hi John Doe

First, if there are strong feelings about this, perhaps put your name on it rather than be anonymous.  If several of the young adults in this article can put their name out there, perhaps you can too in order to start a dialogue.  Second, the original One Westwood article states “just ask your kids” about the curriculum.  Well the youth have spoken and I personally believe that no one put them up to it.  In fact, these young adults are a testament to the valuable teaching at WPS.

Third to discuss math MCAS scores without the context of the pandemic is myopic.  Let’s do the math,  validation of data, the back testing, and analysis of learning loss   BUT not blame teachers.

8
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Math scores literally have nothing to do with anything being discussed. And disagreeing with diversity, equity, and inclusion, particularly in the manner in which OW has done so, is literally racist and homophobic.

4
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Hi, all, I'm thrilled that folks are finding Westwood Minute a place they can share their comments and ideas on this important issue! Just a friendly reminder to please keep comments to the issues. If addressing a particular person, please avoid wording that the other person could construe as an insult or attack.  Debate is great and can be productive, if we can keep talking to each other. Thanks, everyone for contributing to this community discussion.

4
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Darlene, The advert that you allowed to be published, itself, was an attack on many members of our community.  Dialogue *should* be civil, and if that is the goal, perhaps publishing this advertisement was a mistake.

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

I applaud the students who courageously shared their thoughts and concerns in response to the OneWestwood advertisement. Our dynamic global community calls for young leaders to take these steps and help us move forward. I too, fully support Westwood’s initiatives to continue implementation of diverse, inclusive curriculum that promotes equity across our district. Teaching kindness, respect and courage is always the right choice and we are seeing the outcome of those efforts in the student responses.

If you were not already aware, Inclusive Westwood has been circulating a petition to promote DEI efforts across the community. Here is a link where you can add your name alongside mine and 1000+ others!   

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScn-1vOigw3aNE30uTuSdm-rOPjjOz…

11
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

I have read both sides and it seems there is some serious misunderstanding of the One Westwood article. It explicitly states they are NOT against inclusion or diversity but rather want parents to be in charge of teaching certain topics to their children. Not everyone will have the same views on what is appropriate to teach a child at a certain time and we need to be respectful of that. Lashing out and calling people racist or homophobic doesn’t do anything except fuel the fires of division. It’s not civil and it shows a lack of actually wanting to understand or at least consider other people and their opinions. Just because people want to teach things to their children differently doesn’t make them terrible people. At the end of the day we all just want our children to be kind to each other and there are plenty of ways to do that without bringing politics and gender ideologies into it. 

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

First, it is disingenuous to claim that you have "read both sides" without disclosing that you are well known as a member of One Westwood (which is documented in previous public comments).

Secondly, the assumptions that you are claiming people are incorrectly making are actually quite clear from One Westwood's public statements:
- Trying to exclude conversations regarding gender and race from schools IS actively against diversity and inclusion.
- Trying to control what discussions can happen around race in schools IS racist.
- Using the terms "gender dysphoria" and "sexual preference" instead of transgender and sexual identity IS homophobic and transphobic.
- Despite the bizarre comparison with gulags, it is at least clear that One Westwood is against equity.

One Westwood's public attacks ARE fueling fires of division. Comments about gulags are NOT showing civility. And One Westwood's perspective is NOT being kind to our children.

Trust me, people DO understand One Westwood's point of view. It might be time to reflect on why these publications have provoked such a strong rejection of your point of view.

6
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

I have read both sides and it’s funny you speak about disclosing my identity or any affiliations with any group when you yourself choose to be listed under an alias. I stopped reading your comment when you started attacking me. I will not go back and forth with people that can’t remain civil. I’m not sure where there is public record of any affiliation with any group but if you say so it must be true. Have a wonderful day!

1
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

That is a fair point about me commenting anonymously. I don't know how a productive or "civil" conversation would happen when one person sees something they don't like and immediately rejects the whole thing, but my response was more for other people reading than for you anyway.

3
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

I want to thank Olivia Spink, author of this article, and all of the young voices speaking out against the racist, sexist, transphobic, homophobic, and generally offensive messaging by members of the OW group. It takes courage and strength to speak up for what’s right—especially in an environment (like ours) that is not always sufficiently protective of the vulnerable and their allies. The OW article was truly difficult to read both because of the overt hate speech it contained and because it was truly terribly written. Gulags are pretty scary, but so are bad sentence structure and faulty semantics. Not to mention the tragically misinformed and nakedly ignorant platitudes. Olivia’s article and the majority of her quote sources are a much- needed reminder that compassion, education, and cultural competence continue to be espoused by the majority in our town and in our schools. I hope everyone who is able takes Ms. Spink’s advice and votes in the School Committee election on April 26th. As she suggests, do your research. It is clear that this odious group is fully supporting one candidate.

9
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Why are you calling One Westwood an “odious” group just because you disagree with them? Which candidate are they supporting? I haven’t seen any comments or support from anyone listed which is why I ask. Are you just assuming or do you have actual evidence?

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Hi Tina C, thanks for reaching out. It sounds like you're misunderstanding some key points and I'm happy to clarify for you. As many of us are pointing out in this thread, OW is perpetuating and publicly sharing objectively ignorant, racist, transphobic, generally bigoted views that are directly harmful to the community. It is this, not their alignment or misalignment with my opinion (or frankly anyone's opinion), that makes them odious. I understand if your own connection to this problematic group might make this difficult for you to process. Additionally, I encourage you to research the candidates on your own as I won't be calling out any particular candidate in this forum. 

6
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

These kids are impressive!  Unless they stay in this town or one similar, they are going to be immersed in a much more diverse world where work environments, both public and private, often have DEI professional development. It's great that WPS is preparing them for it.

Additionally, Westwood Public Schools are doing their job according to the Massachusetts frameworks.   

Guidance for MA Public Schools Creating a Safe and Supportive School Environment - Student and Family Support (mass.edu)

Race, Racism, and Culturally Responsive Teaching in History and Social Science in Massachusetts: Frequently Asked Questions

11
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

I am deeply saddened by the hatred infused through this article, Hatred by people accusing hatred by another group when their slogan is” inclusiveness”. I am especially disturbed by the calling out of names of individuals that have a differing opinion then theirs. It borders on the edge of harassment and bullying. I found it even more concerning that someone would call out an officer by name and accuse them of many things but the accuser, themselves, refused to sign their name. How is this acceptable and practicing acceptance? The article represents individuals who tout themselves as being against hatred and bias yet they are actively engaged in it themselves. I moved here many years ago and have never experienced the hatred and bias that I am seeing today. I do not care which side of the fence one is on but rather that one’s thoughts and feelings be relayed in a more dignified manner. How can we, as a community, be against hatred and violence then participate in mudslinging of people or groups not of like mind? Isn’t having differing opinions a means for educating and sharing knowledge? Isn’t this a more acceptable way to handle the diversity on these issues? Why is it ok to accuse someone of hatred and bias and then practice it? There has to be a more civilized and acceptable way to handle this. This country was built on democracy, not one on fear mongering and accusations because one's opinion differs from ours. These actions are unacceptable and are only dividing our community even further. Practice what is being preached, “there is no room for hatred only acceptance”

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Some fact checking:
- "Inclusiveness" is not the slogan of One Westwood nor the students in this article.
- The names given were from the opinion piece that was submitted to the Westwood Minute, and therefore were already public.
- I think many people would qualify the postings by One Westwood as harassment, bullying, hatred, and bias, particularly aimed towards our teachers and transgender students. I can understand why these students would be justifiably angry about that and would respond accordingly.
- One Westwood is clearly not seeking to have a conversation about "differing opinions". The points of view that they are sharing are hateful and should be called out as such.
- One Westwood is also clearly not seeking to practice acceptance of people or ideas that are different than their own.

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Westwood Parent, I have read the post by One Westwood that seems to have fueled the fire. The post presented their view on DEI ,as you and Inclusive Westwood have. They were respectful to Inclusive Westwood and by no means did it appear that there was an attack on any one but the way the curriculum is being presented. Unfortunately social media has provided an outlet to allow people to attack individuals, be disrespectful, and downright mean. I’m quite sure that both groups are against this type of behavior. It is unfortunate that both sides cannot come to an agreement on this curriculum. There should be some give and take and not be a force of only a one way direction. It’s clear this is a very touchy subject and there has been a great deal of name calling and accusations because of one's thoughts, beliefs, and concerns. Everyone’s opinion matters. All of us pay taxes and have a right to a discussion and a balance of what their children learn in the school system. Loudness and hostility is not the way to make that happen. Having read up on the accusations of Heather Morrison, I have seen no indication that she is a “racist” from what I have heard from other people. Her speaking points have been strictly on education and advocacy. Dori Parmelee , is widely supported by Inclusive Westwood and her campaign is aligned with ensuring students are educated to become Global Citizens. “What does it mean to be a global citizen?

A global citizen is someone who is aware of and understands the wider world – and their place in it. They take an active role in their community and work with others to make our planet more peaceful, sustainable and fairer.” I am not seeing this from the group that supports her. Is it fair to say she is supportive of the types of comments and behavior by Inclusive Westwood? I have only seen strong, unfounded accusations, and hatred because Inclusive Westwood does not support Heather. Your response to me did not address my comments but only accusations of One Westwood which , to me, are unfounded. It is disturbing to have an inclusive group that is so hostile and not respectful of others' opinions or beliefs. My understanding of Inclusive Westwood was one that promoted diversity and was against hatred. Diversity includes more than just race , gender, and sexual orientation. One can not change a definition or extract parts of it to meet their agenda. It is time to stop the mudslinging and sit down with the school system and discuss a curriculum that will meet the needs of all its residents, not one particular group. There can be a happy medium.

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Hi Barbara, you seem to be making an assumption that I am involved with Inclusive Westwood, and that I have accused Heather Morrison of being racist, neither of which I have actually stated in any of my comments. I am curious why that would be your assumption. There are plenty of people who disagree with One Westwood's agenda from across the town, and I have voiced no personal opinion on any school committee candidate.

I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Hi Barbara,

As one of the co-founders of Inclusive Westwood, I’m concerned about your assertions about our group making accusations, espousing hatred, name-calling, etc. – they’re not accurate. To learn more about what we’re actually doing, I’d encourage you to join our listserv, follow us on Facebook, and/or read our comment on One Westwood’s recent publicity here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PhaiM8YepNCOxr3VNPLY9ozPTKVejROd/edit

Best, Mandy Taft-Pearman

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

The article refers to "we" asked students.  Who is the "We"?  Also was this a district wide survey, was every student given the opportunity to respond, or was it only given to certain individuals? Was the survey from the school or an outside individual?   I am curious since none of my children received or knew anything about this survey and I'm sure they would have participated 

1
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Hi Barbara,

Thanks for your interest in learning more about the survey. This was a form spread via social media. When I wrote "we," I was referring to myself and the others who shared the form. No, this was not a district wide survey. I also do not claim to speak for the entirety of the student body and have added a note to the article for clarification if it were not evident that I cannot speak for every single student. Similarly, it is important to note that this is a group of students (as I wrote that we asked "some" students). Just as One Westwood does not represent the viewpoint of the entirety of the parent population, I and this article do not represent the entire student population. We are representing a group of student's beliefs. I support the idea of including all student voices and have made efforts to include viewpoints other than my own that were shared in the form. 

6
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Oliver, thank you for your response. Your distribution of the survey does seem to have been done in a means to obtain comments that attacked the One Westwood post and the individuals who wrote it. This is unacceptable and I feel you could have done a better job with the distribution to allow more individuals to respond. What sites did you post it too? What groups? You stated in your response to me that “ I also do not claim to speak for the entirety of the student body” Yet your opening statement is “One Westwood is a group in our town, looking to suppress diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in our school system as they are currently being implemented.” This statement alone resonates that you are labeling One Westwood for the entire student body. I think your intentions were well intended but there were definite flaws in its presentation. This survey allowed for discriminatory remarks, labeling, calling out people by name with accusations, and was not within the values which the School promotes. It only promoted hatred and diversity which is the polar opposite of DEI.

2
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

Hi Barbara,

Thanks for your feedback. I would like to point out that the line that you highlighted, “One Westwood is a group in our town, looking to suppress diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in our school system as they are currently being implemented” is not taking a stance or representing an opinion. Rather, it is simply restating One Westwood’s ideas. For your reference, here is a line from their website: “Many of the new initiatives [referring to this “highly politicized” version of DEI initiatives] were implemented while we were sheltering in our homes during 2020. Parents were waking up, paying attention, and not liking what they saw.” As you can see, I was simply paraphrasing their ideas and not offering an opinion in that sentence. It can even be argued that One Westwood is speaking for the whole of the parent population, and that is a whole other issue that I am not looking to address but wanted to mention nonetheless.

Additionally, the goal of the article was to amplify the voices of students who felt helpless in the situation. I had several people reach out to me asking what they could do, so I created a place for them to let their voices be heard (the form was spread via Instagram). For this reason, the goal was not to speak for everyone but instead to provide a different perspective from the one that One Westwood presented. I have also, like I previously mentioned, added the edit to make it more clear that this was not meant to represent the student body.

Thank you and have a nice day,

Olivia

4
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive

I am relieved and heartened to see the responses of many WHS students in response to One Westwood. I, perhaps, am in a particularly good position to understand the nuances demanded by DESE regarding diversity, equity and inclusion as I am a social studies teacher in a nearby high school. Teachers are called upon to welcome all students, no matter who they are, what they choose to call themselves or what they believe. They must feel safe and be included. As a person whose professional life has been spent in education, I constantly learn how much I don’t know. Many marginalized people have had their stories left out of the narrative and it is my obligation to adjust my teaching. As a white person I don’t feel guilty about wrongs done in the past. I doubt my students do either. Instead, I hope they resolve to do better. I wonder how many critics of DEI have been in a high school lately. Just today,  I saw a male student wearing a skirt and tights, 2 female students holding hands and a transgender student showing off their senior photo. I don’t care if you disagree with their “lifestyle.” Being inclusive is not indoctrination. That accusation is ridiculous. If I had the power to indoctrinate students they would all believe that doing their homework on time and not procrastinating is the only way to go! In addition, representation matters. Our children live in a world that is radically different from the one we grew up in. Kids may have 2 moms, for example. Studies show that gender identity is formed before age 3. Normalization of kids’ feelings and experiences is a good thing if we want to raise children with good mental health and strong self esteem. Keep up the good work Westwood Public Schools.

10
I disagree with this
This is unverified
Spam
Offensive