Image
Westwood Select Board at its meeting at Westwood Public Library on Monday, September 28, voted to adopt a new scope and a not-to-exceed budget of $39,981,158 for construction of a new Fire Station 1. Town officials say this amount represents a reduction of $1.62 million, or 4 percent less, from the $41.6 million total cost of the project in 2025, as calculated by combining $3.5 million that was appropriated for design and bid work plus $38.1 million in additional construction and project costs that voters rejected at the ballot box in two votes taken in June and September last year.
The Select Board will present the revised project budget to voters for approval at a Special Town Meeting on October 26.
In August, Select Board approved the FS1 Steering Committee's recommendation to use the former Deerfield School property as the future location for Fire Station 1. Following that decision, site plans for the new FS1 were presented and updated after feedback from the Westwood community.
“Addressing FS1 is a top priority,” said Select Board Member Joseph Previtera. “This new approach takes both fire department needs and community feedback seriously and will allow us to get the right FS1 for Westwood.”
In early September, the schematic design package was provided to independent cost estimators, who came together to reconcile the cost estimates, resulting in the current project budget, said town officials.
According to town officials, the revised FS1 project includes a smaller facility and a plan for "innovative" funding to reduce the burden on taxpayers. Town officials have highlighted the following six aspects of the revised project plan:
1. Reduced Facility Size: The design calls for an approximately 29,000-square-foot facility with four apparatus bays, about a 19 percent decrease in size compared to the earlier plan for FS1 that was presented in November 2024 as a 35,833 square foot project.
2. Reduced Tax Impact: Town officials estimate that the annual tax impact of the project on the average single-family homeowner will be $343, an 8 percent reduction from the prior projected tax increase of $372 per year. Most single-family homeowners with properties at or below the median assessed property value of $1,077,000 could see an annual cost of less than $300, town officials said.
3. "Innovative" Funding Plan: The funding plan proposes using $5.18 million in non-debt excluded funding sources, including free cash, proceeds from the sale of real estate, meals and hotel tax revenue, and recreation revolving funds. Town officials estimate that this would reduce the debt-excluded bond by 13 percent, resulting in a $10 million less in debt service payments over 30 years and reducing overall tax impact.
4. No Projected FS-1 Related Tax Impact until Fiscal Year 2029: Preliminary cash flow and funding forecasts indicate that FS1-related tax impacts are not projected to begin until FY29, which starts July 1, 2028. Final bond issuance timing and interest rates would be subject to market conditions.
5. Firefighter Health and Safety Features: The new proposal continues to include features to help protect firefighters, including decontamination space and separate "hot" and "cold" zones intended to remove carcinogens from living and working spaces.
6. Community Benefits: As part of the proposed project, the Deerfield site would be renovated to replace fields and/or green space, improve stormwater management and drainage, and expand the Westwood Public Library parking lot to benefit both field and library users.
“This is the culmination of a great deal of staff, volunteer, consultant, and resident engagement after over 70 public meetings this past year,” said Select Board Chair Marianne LeBlanc Cummings. “I appreciate the focus of the FS1 Committee, verifying the needs of the Fire Department to make the building as efficient as possible, with a funding package that achieves a smaller tax impact despite significant escalation in construction costs.”
“I am proud of the team for the heavy lift all summer to deliver this on time,” said Select Board Clerk Erin Sibley. “And I appreciate how seriously the project team is taking water concerns on site and that the financing plan turns over every rock to be creative with ways to finance this project.”
The adoption of the project scope and budget is one of the final milestones of the FS1 feasibility and schematic design process. As approved by voters at May's Town Meeting, that process includes studying the siting of Fire Station 1 at three possible locations, environmental review, traffic analysis, public outreach, and other related professional services.
Town officials say the feasibility and schematic design report will be finalized in the coming weeks. They are directing interested members of the public to project documents, including presentations, schematic designs, site layouts, and the Town’s funding proposal, at www.westwoodfs1.com/updates-documents.
Updated 9/30/2026 at 1:07 p.m.
No. We were presented with a cost of $38.1M. Not once, but twice. With the end result of 'No' both times.
How is $40M now, 4% less than $38.1?
And what's this out of nowhere number of $41.6M? In case someone forgot, again, we were presented with $38.1M.
The voters sent the message, to get the cost of a new fire station down. No matter where it was to go. We were led to believe that the Deerfield area was going to deliver a less expensive alternative.
What happened?
$38.1M for the current High Street location.
Or
$40M, and 20% smaller(?) for the Deerfield location.
Hmm. Which sounds better now?
All the creative financing ($5M+) explained ('clawed' mostly from 'Free Cash' and other sources) to us at the Select Board's meeting is great, but it's still taxpayers money.
It, doesn't change this new, more expensive, smaller, alternative.
What happened?
A price Not To Exceed? Based on the presentation at the Select Board's meeting, they still haven't completed test borings at the Deerfield location. So we're given a NTE cost, on a still to be finished assessment and design?
You know that when the latest cost estimate is more, and it will be, they'll be back. And what recourse will we have once this project is well underway, say 'No' for any additional?
Let's start this conversation.
Great catch, Brian, and sincere apologies for the confusion. You are correct that Westwood Minute's previous reporting focused on $38.1 million as the project cost voted down by residents in 2025. I should have clarified that the $41.6 million number which town officials are now using is a number that appears to describe 2025 project costs as also including the $3.5 million previously appropriated for design work.
After voters had approved $2.1 million for design work in 2024 and Select Board had allocated $1.4 million in ARPA funds for design work, what was left at issue was whether tax payers would fund the then-envisioned project's $38.1 million construction and related project costs. As such, Westwood Minute articles in 2025 focused on the $38.1 million under discussion, as that was the amount voters were being asked to approve in funding.
If you total the voter and Select Board approved $3.5 million design costs for the 2025 project plan, and add the $38.1 million of projected 2025 construction costs that voters ultimately rejected, the total 2025 project costs come out to $41.6 million.
I have updated the lead paragraph of this article to clarify this. Apologies for the confusion -- you were right to point it out.
Hi Darlene - Thanks for updating.
Hi Brian - Thanks for your questions. While the last project is not worth debating, my understanding is that the select board held the second vote because contractors agreed to hold pricing. The town voted no again and that was everyone's right.
The Deerfield site definitely has advantages which helps with a smaller footprint/construction costs. (drive through bays, 2 stories instead of 3, etc)
Given the increase in construction costs, a smaller building does not result in a lower cost project unfortunately. The cost per square foot for last year's project was $767/sf. The new project cost is $1,067/sf. This has been presented in various forums, messaging, etc.
In addition, residents gave specific feedback that financing the project entirely through a debt exclusion was concerning from a tax perspective so the town/long range financial planning committee looked at ways to accomplish lowering the tax burden. No one is saying that the application of alternative funding is not taxpayer money.
With all due respect, the conversation started years ago. The committee and town staff are happy to meet people where they are so please feel free to reach out again at fs1committee@westwoodma.gov
There are also a number of community outreach events posted weekly.
Not quite following you. Since you were on the original steering committee, you voted for the current location. When I suggested the Deerifield site, in order to possibly expedite the building of a new fire station, by avoiding the time delay incurred with demolition of the existing facility, you we're totally against it. Now, you're all for it.
What changed?
Regarding the "last project is not worth debating, it most assuredly is. It's being used as a cost comparison! To attempt to demonstrate if we've evolved with our (your) project development in getting this facility built.
Regarding your statement about "your understanding is that the select board held the second vote because contractors agreed to hold pricing", you know that. We all do. We're not new to this rodeo.
Additionally, your statement "With all due respect, the conversation started years ago." What? Who hasn't?
Also "The committee and town staff are happy to meet people where they are so please feel free to reach out again at fs1committee@westwoodma.gov".
Regarding that statement, I wrote the FS1 Steering Committee a couple of days ago about what I've pointed out here and elsewhere. No response as of today.
About meeting one-on-one, no need, we have public forums such as the Westwood Minute, and other venues, to comment, ask questions, and be responded to. And that's how it should be. No secret one-on-ones.
Deerfield wasn't an option last year since it was under the care, custody and control of the school department. The SC voted at their December meeting to turn the Deerfield site over to the town at the May 2026 annual town meeting. Also, there were concerns over wetlands in the area and it took the funding voted on at town meeting in May for the pre-feasibility studies to delineate any wetlands.
My comment re: the last September's vote since the contractor agreed to hold pricing was intended to help you understand that last year we had pricing locked in and the price per sf increased - but the building's footprint is smaller. Apologies if that upset you - was only trying to help clarify. Your questions are helpful because it helps the committee re: where to focus messaging if people aren't understanding that a smaller building doesn't automatically mean a corresponding lower cost.
If you haven't received a reply to the e-mail you sent Tuesday evening, I'm sure you will tomorrow. Many residents appreciate the opportunity to connect in person at a community conversation, forum or town event. Westwood Minute and social media posts aren't necessarily monitored for comments so much like the school committee, we have designated ways to best communicate.
Darlene,
Thank you. My comments were not so much for having the Westwood Minute clarify content within the article. Rather, my point was, we voted twice in 2025 on a $38.1M cost for building the new fire station. A bid price for construction by the apparent low bidder. Now, we'll be asked to vote on a moving target cost of $40M. $40M on a project that isn't even bid ready.
Huge difference.
Rather than waiting to put the project out to bid, and get a hard number, as we had to vote on in 2025, we're once again rushing the whole process without any concrete numbers (escalation costs are not concrete numbers for selling this latest version/cost estimate).
Let's put the new proposed design, and specs, out to bid and see what comes back.
Leading up to that process, I suggest the Town add an additional column to the Project Scope & Budget Markup Cost Breakout chart, presented at the Select Board meeting of 9/28, and define the cost differences between 2025 ($38.1-$41.6M?) and 2026 ($39.9M) and provide comparison and clarity across all associated cost items.
Also, incorporate all costs spent to-date on this second attempt of getting a new station built. Outside of the Proposed $39.9M, other taxpayer money has been spent on preliminary work as part of assessing feasibility of sites.
Additionally, we need to stop leading off these presentations about how bad the current fire station is. We all know it's current condition and that it isn't sustainable or safe. Focus needs to be on the costs to remedy the situation. Not continuing to market the selling of the latest cost of a new facility by injecting a 'we need it yesterday' to justify not doing do diligence on minimizing cost and maximizing a new facility. It's 'falling down' descriptions are viewed as an attempt to muddy the waters about justifying costs and rushing this to a vote.
Lastly, are we at a point where we can apply value engineering and get the latest proposed cost down further?
Thank you.
The difference between $41.6 and $38.1 is $3.5 million.
So we lost $3.5 million on the design for a fire station that was to have been constructed on High Street for a cost of $38.1 million.
We LOST $3.5 million! Never to get it back. Bet Dorr and Whittier are happy. No loss to them.
That's not what people expected. The NO vote was to send the message to reduce the size of the fire station for High Street by making adjustments to the existing design. The design we had paid $3.5 million for to get a fire station built on High St. for less.
Based on what I've seen, now we'll spend an additional $4.2 million on design and engineering, $1.7 for owners management, and $1.2 for furniture and equipment. That adds up to $7.1 million!
Add that to $3.5 million we'll never get back, and that's a total of $10.6 million!!!!!! With not one shovel ever getting into the ground!
How does it figure that the latest version is presented as 4% less?
Why didn't we just add a tiny bit more onto the High St. design and downsize it and not have wasted $3.5 million on reinventing the wheel?
For goodness sake! I've never seen so much nickel and diming in my life, and all about a FIRE STATION that serves the ENTIRE community. We spent $90MM+- for an ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ("PHS"), but residents complained that a cost of $40MM+- for a fire station was objectionable. It makes no sense at all.
I absolutely appreciate your support of the station but wanted to clarify that the town paid approximately $60 million for Pine Hill - due to funding provided by MSBA.
I hear the "90 million school" used frequently and that's not what we paid. The cost of renovating Hanlon and Deerfield was approximately $40 million (and I'm not sure that approach would have met the needs of both schools) so the town was able to build new for $60M.
The town voted at a special town meeting in January 2024 to design a 38,000sf fire station headquarters at the current site. That design was for a station with 5 bays which is needed to meet programmatic needs of the fire department. When the town voted no, it's not like D&W could have gone back and just made minor revisions to the size of the station. Changing the design to 4 bays would have resulted in a new design (not meeting needs of the fire department and at an additional cost) They essentially did what they were contracted for and paid to do and what the town voted on.
This project is different and consistent with how school buildings and many other municipal buildings are voted on - voting at 100 percent schematic design.
Reminder that you can e-mail questions/comments re: the FS1 project to FS1committee@westwoodma.gov